LUMINNOVATE

Insights

Is the reason for a hardship plan a signal of what comes next?

64.7%Public lending data

Which hardship plans hold

of plans for lasting hardship went bad, against 31.8% for temporary shocks

What was observed
4,433 hardship plans, granted either for a temporary shock such as a natural disaster or for lasting hardship.
What a generic approach says
Treat every hardship plan alike.
What the engine read
Plans for lasting hardship went bad 64.7% of the time, against 31.8% for temporary shocks, comparing borrowers in similar circumstances before the plan.
What it meant for the decision
The reason for a plan deserves its own treatment path. Whether a plan changes the outcome is a separate question, answered by a measured trial.

Figures are reproduced from Luminnovate's research records. Data sources are available on request; methods are proprietary.

Every decision that moves money should be able to show its working.

Book a conversation